Microsoft surprise O.D.F move
|
|
|
Microsoft commits to using open document format. Microsoft intends to integrate use of the open document format (ODF) in 2009.
This move will be a surprise to many given Microsoft’s history of European commission monopoly related fines. The free software foundation gave a cautious welcome to the move as did the European commission.
The essence of this story is the intended move by Microsoft away from the file format interoperability issues faced by developers and users of non Microsoft products. Some would argue that Microsoft should be allowed to use whatever format they wish. Microsoft effectively argued this for some time. Regardless, few are likely to accept this as an altruistic move by the software giant. Already there are two main schools of thought on the issue. The principal belief is that Microsoft simply need to move away from the arena of ongoing combat with the European commission as this has proven to be an expensive path of serial loss. The later group see this as evidence that Microsoft simply accept that they are likely to be more profitable and competitive if they effectively enable interoperability with systems and software which are not by default a part of the Microsoft road-map. This should lead to the entry in to the Microsoft arena of a considerable number of developers who quite simply could not use make use of Microsoft software for their clients because of the cost of moving from legacy formats. People in business do not avoid Microsoft products for personal reasons. Interoperability and compatibility can only increase market share for the worlds largest software company. This was not always the case and Microsoft jealously guarded their format in the early days to avoid their software being effectively reverse engineered as happened to the hardware solutions offered by IBM in the 80s.
Regardless of the reasons, this is a step in the right direction. The main issue now will be the level of interoperability. Nobody expects Microsoft to release their source code and nobody can expect them to integrate all third party software. This method of integration will likely take the form of a developers forum which provides information to members and assistance to members closely alignedto the intended Microsoft formats. In addition we can expect early release of beta software to interested parties so they can launch complementary products with or soon after Microsoft. Is it a strange coincidence that Bill will be retired before this matures or is it the case that he has put the wheels in motion on this before his departure. You’re gonna have to ask Bill.
|
|
If you liked that post, then try these...
HP mass storage offers management cost savings. on May 22nd, 2008
Hewlett Packard launch petabyte storage option.
Eurozone Mobile phone content probe and cleanup on July 17th, 2008
Euro action to clean up mobile phone services and content industry.
Tags: free software foundation, microsoft format, microsoft odf, open document format



May 22nd, 2008 at 9:09 pm
Is this blog for real?
Microsoft going in to open source, Google getting in to the health business and HP offering so much storage that noone knows the terminology for the quantities!
Just kiddin, great blog. I’ll do an Arnie Schwarzenegger. (:
May 23rd, 2008 at 12:21 am
It’s hard to guage where this could end up. One possible difficulty for the open source community is the sudden influx of commercial entities who wrote tools and sub application for Microsoft products in to the open source arena. While this may reduce prices of current singular environment compatible products, it is likely to increase the percentage of payment requirement areas in the open source community. These commercial entities will in fairness have to do this. An open source crusader can “give” his / her time to the community but a corporation with large numbers of programmers must raise invoices…..
Ronan
May 24th, 2008 at 10:26 pm
microsoft have despite very heavy and public fines managed to frustrate the eu monopolies and mergers watch dog. they will likely do likewise with a lesser funded free software foundation.
May 26th, 2008 at 1:08 pm
I see where you are going wit this but is it not possible that Msoft know they will only benefit from this if they provide some element of helpful integration and that they would not be doing this if they thought it not possible or beneficial to all?